Age of employment: Why are the young people suffering?

Police haven of agitation to increase the age of government jobs File images

The age of entry into the government service in our country is 30 years. Whether it is comparable to many countries of the world or whether it is necessary to increase the timeframe in the reality of this country, it has been going on for a long time with the writings of human writers and seminars - a series of programs including memorandum appearing. The government sometimes stood in favor of increasing the age of entry into the service. But the location also changed for unknown reasons. Long-term movement is now on hunger strike. Will the government judge the rationality of hunger strike?

Why the age of entry into the government service needs to be increased?

When our average lifetime was below sixty, our job was 57 years in retirement. Now the retirement period has been set 59 years. Talks are underway to increase the deadline for retirement. Due to the increased retirement time, the opportunities for new entrants to the jobs were reduced for two years. Because, if the upper posts are vacant, then there are opportunities for recruitment of manpower in the following posts. Considering that the age limit for entry into the service should be increased. At the same time, it was reasonable to increase the age of retirement and increase the age of entry into the service.

Schooling has increased, the deadline for entry into the service is not increased

Before two years of graduation in our country of education Now has been three years. Before graduation (Honors) was a three-year course, now four years. Earlier, it was necessary to finish the post-graduation four years, now five years. Even after schooling has increased for one year, the age limit for entry into the service does not increase. The age of entry into the service is 32 years because of higher schooling in medical colleges. Why the age of entry into the job will not increase if the general public schooling is increased?

It is important to increase time for the attention of the students in the syllabus

There is a group of graduates (masters) and postgraduate students at the university or college level, who are well-versed in the syllabus. The academic results continue to study the day and night in the hope of doing well. The goal is to achieve their first grade or better CGPA. Those who are usually focused on curriculum lessons, they can not take up the job preparation well. They have to prepare for the curriculum after the completion of the exam. As a result, they get much less during job preparation. Due to the reduced age of entry into the service, many people have reduced their subject-based studies to just under the BCS examination and another job guide. This made many meritorious students discouraged by paying attention to the syllabus.

Who is responsible for the loss of job-seekers?

A student suffered a lot of time due to a systemic error in his education career. A student has passed SSC examination at the age of 16. At the age of 18, he passed the Higher Secondary examination. At the age of 22 years of graduation (honor) passed. Postgraduate at the age of 23 If the age of entry into a government service is 30 years, then everyone will get seven years to get the job, for the job. The government is giving them the time they are wasting due to systemic error? There is no such method that a student will get seven years to earn a job from the day after graduate pass. Now it takes 26 to 28 years for anyone to finish post-graduation. Who will take responsibility for losses for a few years due to procedural or sessional reasons? One way is to increase the age of entry into their jobs.

Increasing the age of entry into a job is profitable?

If you increase the age of entry into government service, there is no danger of losing. Rather, those who want to apply their talents in government jobs will have an additional opportunity. This is the welfare of the country. Over 38 years of entry into government jobs in many countries including America, South Africa, Nepal Bangladesh job seekers want only 35 years The government's reluctance to implement this

Is the government's effort far away?

Before the elections in 2014, the Grand Alliance government chose some jobs to increase popularity. Among these, it was also said to increase the age limit for government services. Since the participation of the public was not very much in the elections in 2014, the issue may have been pressed. A group of students is trying hard to increase the age limit for government jobs. A few years ago, a seminar organized by the Bangladesh Chhatra Parishad demanded to increase the age limit for the entry into the service in Dhaka. There Rashed Khan Menon was also present. He was then the President of Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education Ministry. He also promised that he would also play a role in increasing the age limit of government jobs. That attempt is far off?

The protesters started a hunger strike to implement the demand. Actually, their hunger does not happen suddenly. After long movement, they sat on hunger strike. It may seem strange that everyone is only raising the demand in the last year of the government and sitting on hunger strike. It is important to consider why doing a hunger strike, whether their hunger is rational or not. The government has time for this period and it's a little longer. We hope that the government will rationally support the demands of the protesters. Because they did not want jobs, did not want unemployed allowances, more time trying to get jobs. Honorable Prime Minister will increase the age limit for young meritorious students to enter government service - that is our belief.